Monday, August 31, 2015

Q&ampA: Underground machinist

Q&ampA: Underground machinist

To craft the experiment&#39s precise copper parts away from cosmic rays, the lab evolved a exclusive feature: the deepest machine shop in the world, complete with lathe, CNC mill, wire EDM (electrical discharge machine), 70-ton press and a laser engraver to …
Study far more on Symmetry magazine



Fastenal Now Has 50000+ Industrial Vending Devices Installed at Consumer Web sites

This milestone would have seemed unthinkable in 2008 when Fastenal displayed two prototype machines at its annual buyer expo, signaling the debut of its vending program. At the time, industrial vending (dispensing high-demand shop consumables at the …
Study far more on MarketWatch




(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

3D-printed vehicles moving closer to production

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center: Boeing B-29 Superfortress “Enola Gay”, with Lockheed P-38J-ten-LO Lightning
prototype parts made in china

Image by Chris Devers

Quoting Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum | Lockheed P-38J-ten-LO Lightning :


In the P-38 Lockheed engineer Clarence &quotKelly&quot Johnson and his team of designers created one particular of the most successful twin-engine fighters ever flown by any nation. From 1942 to 1945, U. S. Army Air Forces pilots flew P-38s over Europe, the Mediterranean, and the Pacific, and from the frozen Aleutian Islands to the sun-baked deserts of North Africa. Lightning pilots in the Pacific theater downed more Japanese aircraft than pilots flying any other Allied warplane.


Maj. Richard I. Bong, America’s top fighter ace, flew this P-38J-10-LO on April 16, 1945, at Wright Field, Ohio, to evaluate an experimental technique of interconnecting the movement of the throttle and propeller control levers. However, his right engine exploded in flight prior to he could conduct the experiment.


Transferred from the United States Air Force.


Manufacturer:
Lockheed Aircraft Company


Date:

1943


Country of Origin:

United States of America


Dimensions:

All round: 390 x 1170cm, 6345kg, 1580cm (12ft 9 9/16in. x 38ft 4 five/8in., 13988.2lb., 51ft 10 1/16in.)


Components:

All-metal


Physical Description:

Twin-tail boom and twin-engine fighter tricycle landing gear.


• • • • •


Quoting Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum | Boeing B-29 Superfortress &quotEnola Gay&quot:


Boeing’s B-29 Superfortress was the most sophisticated propeller-driven bomber of Planet War II and the initial bomber to property its crew in pressurized compartments. Even though made to fight in the European theater, the B-29 discovered its niche on the other side of the globe. In the Pacific, B-29s delivered a variety of aerial weapons: standard bombs, incendiary bombs, mines, and two nuclear weapons.


On August 6, 1945, this Martin-built B-29-45-MO dropped the first atomic weapon utilized in combat on Hiroshima, Japan. 3 days later, Bockscar (on display at the U.S. Air Force Museum near Dayton, Ohio) dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki, Japan. Enola Gay flew as the advance climate reconnaissance aircraft that day. A third B-29, The Wonderful Artiste, flew as an observation aircraft on each missions.


Transferred from the United States Air Force.


Manufacturer:
Boeing Aircraft Co.
Martin Co., Omaha, Nebr.


Date:

1945


Nation of Origin:

United States of America


Dimensions:

General: 900 x 3020cm, 32580kg, 4300cm (29ft 6 5/16in. x 99ft 1in., 71825.9lb., 141ft 15/16in.)


Materials:

Polished all round aluminum finish


Physical Description:

4-engine heavy bomber with semi-monoqoque fuselage and high-aspect ratio wings. Polished aluminum finish all round, normal late-Planet War II Army Air Forces insignia on wings and aft fuselage and serial quantity on vertical fin 509th Composite Group markings painted in black &quotEnola Gay&quot in black, block letters on reduce left nose.


3D-printed cars moving closer to production

The 3D-printed vehicle, simply configurable and created correct before your eyes, is coming closer to reality. A California-based organization unveiled a prototype supercar that it says could dramatically decrease &quotthe pollution, components and capital fees&quot that go …
Study a lot more on USA Right now


The Amiga turns 30—“Nobody had ever designed a private computer this way”

It pioneered desktop video and introduced PCs to numerous new users, rocketing Amiga and Commodore to the top for a short moment in the sun. About Ars, our remembrance of the machine has unfolded over six years, starting in 2007. Over eight parts and&nbsp…
Read much more on Ars Technica


Mobileye gives alternative route to Google&#39s driverless future

JERUSALEM (Bloomberg) — Ziv Aviram regularly drives portion of the 42-mile stretch to Tel Aviv from Jerusalem with no hands. Gliding through traffic along Highway 1, the auto slows and accelerates independently as Aviram focuses on his iPhone. The on …
Read far more on Automotive News



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

Cool Prototype Machine Shop pictures

A handful of nice prototype machine shop photos I discovered:


2014 grocery buying at the Clifton Speedy Shop
prototype machine shop

Image by brizzle born and bred

On a sunny spring morning in the quiet village of Clifton in Derbyshire, a steady stream of individuals are generating their way towards the Cock Inn. They are not early increasing drinkers the pub is not but open. As an alternative they head about to the vehicle park at the back.


Here sits the UK’s very first “automated shop” – a bus shelter-sized giant vending machine promoting every thing from fresh milk and eggs to umbrellas and cat meals.


Made to look like a quaint village shop, yet with the advantage of far more reputable opening hours, it is intended to lead a quiet, mechanised revolution in rural regions across Britain, filling the gap left by the widespread closure of standard retailers.


The Clifton Speedy-Shop, as it is formally known, has been gratefully welcomed by residents, who haven’t had a village shop for far more than a decade.


“They quite considerably emptied it on Monday evening. It was excellent,” says Lorraine Garside, the landlady of the Cock, who admits that she has currently fed her hungry consumers using a loaf of bread bought from the machine.


“We haven’t had a village shop for about 13, 14 years and there are no bus services by means of the village any more, so if you want a pint of milk you have to stroll into town if you don’t drive. It’s very reasonably priced – I believe it is marvellous.”


The machine is the brainchild of Peter Fox, a 50-year-old electrical engineer who employed to live in a small village and became frustrated at coming property late from operate to uncover nothing at all in the fridge. Having spent more than two years designing the prototype, he now hopes that equivalent machines can be rolled out nationally, but says he does not have the sources to expand as quickly as he would like and is now actively seeking a business companion.


“I personal all the intellectual property, but I do not have a factory with 500 folks and I cannot manufacture hundreds of these a week,” he says. “I undoubtedly intend to roll it out myself anyway, and I’ve already got other machines in my factory which are almost complete … but naturally I can not instantly begin producing hundreds of machines and sending them all more than the UK. To do that I’ve either got to grow organically, which will take time, or find somebody who desires to jump in with me.”


Accepting cash or credit cards, the machine emails Mr Fox anytime it dispenses an item, so he can keep track of stock levels. Despite the fact that he is reluctant to reveal just how very good company has been so far, on the grounds that it is “early days”, he says there has been a “steady stream” of villagers acquiring every little thing from washing powder to toothpaste and bags of sugar.


Handy for buying important household staple, a can of eight hot dogs (89p). Other items on provide incorporated six eggs (£1.75), bacon (£2.69), a pair of sticky toffee puddings (£1.99) and a book of first class stamps (£3.60).


Even though the machine is attracting far more publicity than Clifton has received in years, most buyers yesterday seemed happier to browse rather than purchase. Barbara Goodwin, out for a stroll with her husband and their two dogs, was amongst the window shoppers. “I’m not quite certain,” she says. “There is a general shop a couple of miles away. But having stated that, late at evening, you don’t have to go far, and it is extremely hassle-free.”


The machine carries another benefit for Mrs Garside: relieving the stress on her pub to act as an informal grocer for naive vacationers who rent self-catered cottages, only to be left baffled at the village’s lack of a Tesco Express. “You do get some southerners … who come up and feel that every quaint village has a shop, and of course it doesn’t any more,” she says. “So now we have.”



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

Aalborg Workshop with illutron

Some cool speedy prototyping techniques images:


Aalborg Workshop with illutron
rapid prototyping methods

Image by geekphysical

illutron &amp GeekPhysical teamed up to bring an intense 3 day workshop to Aalborg University students. Day 1 was with Vanessa and introduced students to speedy prototyping, learning from the business, design in the true world, design and style methods and introduction to Arduino. Day two and three have been get-dirty days with Dzl and illutron member Christian Liljedahl as they tore into scrap electronics, toys and other ‘junk’ to support students determine components and their properties, and create intriguing projects that had been displayed for family members, pals, and the public in an exhibition the subsequent day.



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

Sunday, August 30, 2015

1-Offs Without having Tradeoffs

A single-Offs With out Tradeoffs

This element was at first machined making use of two metal soft jaws, but a single of the jaws was marring the part&#39s look, so the shop replaced it with a printed jaw. … In MarkForged&#39s case, fiber-reinforced 3D printing produced a jaw as powerful as the …
Study a lot more on Contemporary Machine Shop


Enfield Welding Firm&#39s Work Touches Projects Destined For Deep Sea, Outer Space

Dowd also said the weld line is narrower and cleaner, requiring less machining. Electron beam welding also is beneficial … Shiny pieces of steel and aluminum sit on pallets, waiting to be fused together. The approach is controlled by … Some of the function …
Study much more on Hartford Courant


Muncaster Technologies launches Muncaster 3 for sophisticated CNC machining

“The S3 is for those organisations looking to make much better prototypes and parts, quicker and a lot more cheaply, from frequent prototyping and production intent materials which includes prototype composites, aluminum, brass, acrylic, ABS or wood. We&#39ve designed …
Study more on TCT Magazine


The Recline of Civilization

On Zodiac&#39s factory floor—where it requires about 3 hours to assemble a complete seat—Funk shows me a machined aluminum “spreader” from the new version of the 5751, Zodiac&#39s most well-known extended-variety seat, developed for twin-aisle aircraft and …
Study much more on Air & Space Magazine



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

BMW GUGGENHEIM LAB

Some cool prototype components made in china pictures:


BMW GUGGENHEIM LAB
prototype parts made in china

Image by DCF_pics

MARS IN MUMBAI

Prototypes of change created for the BMW Guggenheim Lab


Informal settlements dominate considerably of the world’s emerging cityscape. The tense social and spatial circumstances they bring forth render most urban approaches ineffective. Neither leading-down organizing, defined by a technocratic approach of ever bigger infrastructure, nor bottom-up efforts, in the form of increasingly sophisticated neighborhood level projects, look in a position to meet the challenges at the scale the establishing metropolis demands. Can micro-scale interventions be made to attain citywide techniques?


This conceptual divide is additional exacerbated in Mumbai, where slums that make up two-thirds of the population reduce by means of the whole island city in a sharp spatial divide. Attempts to address the dire challenges from, water safety to pollution and serious congestion, are limited to either the formal or informal settlements. MARS Architects has made a vision for a United Mumbai, the starting point for incorporating informal settlements as fully integrated parts of the formal city.


Over the coming weeks, stakeholder meetings will be held at the Guggenheim Lab Mumbai to go over our ten proposed technologies, from wall systems to transport systems. Comply with us as an expanding system of architectural interventions turns slums into sustainable settlements, which in turn become the backbone of a United Mumbai.


Component 1: SPI MODEL

The foundation of this project is an in-depth study of Mumbai’s population density. Not merely mapping Mumbai’s infamous circumstances in abstract terms but introducing a new methodology that much better represents the knowledge on the ground. The new metric, known as the Stacked Population Index (SPI), measures the density of folks per quantity of obtainable floor surface. Abruptly the accurate extents of Mumbai’s informal settlements can be observed: a yellow forest of towering densities covers the entire urban landscape. The harsh reality the city accommodates two thirds of its population on significantly less than a quarter of its residential surface, and however urban plans for Mumbai mostly ignore their existence.


Comply with the project: MARS Architects Facebook page


Event details: BMW GUGGENHEIM LAB


BMW GUGGENHEIM LAB
prototype parts made in china

Image by DCF_pics

MARS IN MUMBAI

Prototypes of alter developed for the BMW Guggenheim Lab


Informal settlements dominate a lot of the world’s emerging cityscape. The tense social and spatial conditions they bring forth render most urban approaches ineffective. Neither leading-down arranging, defined by a technocratic method of ever bigger infrastructure, nor bottom-up efforts, in the type of increasingly sophisticated neighborhood level projects, look able to meet the challenges at the scale the establishing metropolis demands. Can micro-scale interventions be made to accomplish citywide approaches?


This conceptual divide is additional exacerbated in Mumbai, where slums that make up two-thirds of the population reduce through the entire island city in a sharp spatial divide. Attempts to address the dire challenges from, water safety to pollution and severe congestion, are restricted to either the formal or informal settlements. MARS Architects has created a vision for a United Mumbai, the starting point for incorporating informal settlements as fully integrated parts of the formal city.


More than the coming weeks, stakeholder meetings will be held at the Guggenheim Lab Mumbai to go over our ten proposed technologies, from wall systems to transport systems. Comply with us as an expanding system of architectural interventions turns slums into sustainable settlements, which in turn turn out to be the backbone of a United Mumbai.


Portion 1: SPI MODEL

The foundation of this project is an in-depth study of Mumbai’s population density. Not merely mapping Mumbai’s infamous conditions in abstract terms but introducing a new methodology that much better represents the expertise on the ground. The new metric, called the Stacked Population Index (SPI), measures the density of men and women per quantity of obtainable floor surface. Suddenly the accurate extents of Mumbai’s informal settlements can be observed: a yellow forest of towering densities covers the whole urban landscape. The harsh reality the city accommodates two thirds of its population on significantly less than a quarter of its residential surface, and yet urban plans for Mumbai mainly ignore their existence.


Follow the project: MARS Architects Facebook page


Occasion particulars: BMW GUGGENHEIM LAB


BMW GUGGENHEIM LAB
prototype parts made in china

Image by DCF_pics

MARS IN MUMBAI

Prototypes of adjust created for the BMW Guggenheim Lab


Informal settlements dominate significantly of the world’s emerging cityscape. The tense social and spatial situations they bring forth render most urban techniques ineffective. Neither top-down organizing, defined by a technocratic approach of ever bigger infrastructure, nor bottom-up efforts, in the form of increasingly sophisticated neighborhood level projects, seem able to meet the challenges at the scale the building metropolis demands. Can micro-scale interventions be made to attain citywide techniques?


This conceptual divide is additional exacerbated in Mumbai, where slums that make up two-thirds of the population reduce through the entire island city in a sharp spatial divide. Attempts to address the dire challenges from, water safety to pollution and extreme congestion, are limited to either the formal or informal settlements. MARS Architects has developed a vision for a United Mumbai, the beginning point for incorporating informal settlements as completely integrated parts of the formal city.


Over the coming weeks, stakeholder meetings will be held at the Guggenheim Lab Mumbai to talk about our ten proposed technologies, from wall systems to transport systems. Comply with us as an expanding method of architectural interventions turns slums into sustainable settlements, which in turn turn out to be the backbone of a United Mumbai.


Element 1: SPI MODEL

The foundation of this project is an in-depth study of Mumbai’s population density. Not merely mapping Mumbai’s infamous conditions in abstract terms but introducing a new methodology that better represents the expertise on the ground. The new metric, called the Stacked Population Index (SPI), measures the density of folks per quantity of available floor surface. Suddenly the correct extents of Mumbai’s informal settlements can be observed: a yellow forest of towering densities covers the whole urban landscape. The harsh reality the city accommodates two thirds of its population on significantly less than a quarter of its residential surface, and but urban plans for Mumbai largely ignore their existence.


Stick to the project: MARS Architects Facebook page


Event information: BMW GUGGENHEIM LAB



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

Lastest Prototype Components Created In China News

Artist Makes use of Afinia 3D Printer to Make Iron Man Boot Prototype

This capability to bond smaller components together into a bigger portion created his printer&#39s smaller sized develop region much less of a disadvantage. And the mixture of various parts gives the boot prototype its distinctive higher-tech look, as well. To view much more details …
Read a lot more on 3DPrint.com


Gizmag&#39s best picks from SaloneSatellite 2015

Created by Japanese sustainable designer Satoshi Yanagisawa, the DFM01 prototype is a totally-functional 3D-printed racing bicycle. The bike is produced from carbon fiber and a series of 3D-printed titanium components, which are developed using titanium powder that …
Study far more on Gizmag


ZPM Espresso and the Rage of the Jilted Crowdfunder

He could see that it seemed like a peculiar fixation, but the word was so disingenuous and cloying, and it produced him angry. “Notice,” he instructed me, “how I maintain bringing up the &#39love&#39 factor.” It reminded him that what ought to have been a …
Read more on New York Instances



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

Two rotary snow plows parked at Roseville Ca.

A handful of good prototype machine shop pictures I found:


Two rotary snow plows parked at Roseville Ca.
prototype machine shop

Image by Loco Steve

A Short History of the Rotary Snowplow


The very first rotary plow was designed in 1869 by Toronto dentist J.W. Elliot. His design and style, similar to but much more primitive than the later Leslie variety, was by no means built. Several other early plow concepts also died a equivalent death. Some had been constructed in prototype type and scrapped, whilst others in no way were constructed at all.. These incorporated the Hawley plow, the Marshall plow, the Blake Machine Plow and the Kryger steam snow shovel.

The first profitable rotary plow was created by Canadian Orange Jull. He had the plow built by the Leslie Brothers, owners of a machine shop, and tested it in the winter of 1883-84. The Leslies’ soon purchased the manufacturing rights to the plow and went into organization creating ‘Leslie type’ rotaries. This is the type of plow most individuals believe of when you say ‘rotary.’ It has 1 huge circular plow blade rotating on a shaft parallel to the tracks.


Among 1885 and 1903 the Leslies had 62 plows (plus 2 for export) built by several locomotive functions. They then sold the rights to the plows to ALCo. Even so, the Leslies’ company exists to this day. From 1905 to 1937 ALCo constructed 67 plows (plus four for export). Two homebuilt, 42 inch gauge Leslie plows were constructed by Reid Newfoundland. Lima-Hamilton built the final four commercially developed steam rotaries (and the final industrial Leslie types) in 1949-50, below license from ALCo.


Five homebuilt Leslie varieties (four diesel, 1 electric) had been constructed in between 1950 and 1971. The a single plow constructed in 1971, by Union Pacific, was the last Leslie kind built. More than the years Leslies had been built in US Standard Gauge, three foot gauge, and 42 inch gauge, and possibly other gauges for export. Of the 146 recognized Leslie kind plows, there are 41 identified survivors, and five probable/unconfirmed survivors. I took this photo from the California Zephyr December 2010
Check OUT THIS Awesome VIDEO


ACL Columbia Terminal Sheet three
prototype machine shop

Image by michaeljy

I was hoping that it showed more detail of the Southern’s tracks than it does. If any individual can provide extra information, it would be appreciated.


Update. My notation on the scan that, &quotApparently ACL showed only these tracks which they utilised.&quot I believe was a wrong very first impression. I now consider that the original 1917 map has been updated, and the tracks shown in BLACK are the station tracks AS THEY EXISTED IN THE 1960s. What threw me off was that they did not update the umbrella sheds. But, whilst drawing in the dotted red lines, it dawned on me that the tracks shown are as I keep in mind them becoming as a child catching trains and hanging out there in the 1960s.


By 1960, the Assembly Street two-lane overpass had been removed and the street widened to four lanes at ground level. All via station tracks except Tracks 3 and four had been removed east of Assembly Street. The shortened portion of Track five was retained west of Assembly for use in switching vehicles to/from trains, whilst Tracks 6 and 7 became stub-ended at Assembly and had been used for storing and servicing cars laying more than at Columbia. What remains of Tracks five, six, and 7 these days have been further shortened and concrete ramps constructed for unloading MofW equipment and the Circus Train when it comes to town. All umbrella sheds except the 1 amongst Tracks 3 and four were torn down, as was the portion of the surviving a single that had formerly extended below the Assembly Street Bridge. A &quotnew&quot umbrella shed, created out of materials from the dismantled ones, was constructed between Tracks 3 and 4 on the west side of Assembly Street extending all the way to the Gates Street &quotcrossing&quot (which by no means was open as a street by means of there), and from then on, all trains stopped to the WEST of the Assembly Street crossing, so as not to block either Assembly or Primary Streets although in the station. Passengers had to walk or drive down to where the trains would be.


Trains 31 and 32, the Augusta Specific, ran by means of on Track 4. Columbia cars were added to No. 32 and switched out of No. 31, by the &quotStation Job&quot switcher, making use of the truncated Track five as a pickup and set off track. (You can see a photo of No. 32’s engine, as it often stopped on Track 4 at Assembly Street, here: www.flickr.com/images/michaeljy/3571226187 ).


Trains 17 and 18, the Columbia-Greenville regional, arrived and departed in the course of the night, and presumably also employed Track 4, getting made up and put away to/from storage tracks 6 and 7 by the Station Switcher.


Trains 27 and 28, the Carolina Particular, following its Charleston leg was discontinued in 1962, originated and terminated in Columbia, arriving and departing from Track 3. No. 28 was due to arrive at 4:45 p.m., and would stop on Track 3 quick of Assembly Street, and at some point for the duration of the evening would be wyed (turned) by the Station Job and returned to the very same spot, for departure as No. 27 the next day at 11:20 a.m. Meanwhile, No. 31 would have run via about 6 a.m., and with all its switching and No. 27’s gear sitting on Track three, old Union Station need to have looked like really a busy place once more for a half hour or so.


By union agreement, the Station Job Switcher crew went on and off duty at Union Station. In the mid- to late 1960s, the old employee locker and washroom in the basement of the constructing that is now California Dreaming was shut down, and a tiny new brick creating was built just west of Assembly Street, subsequent to Track 5, to serve as a crew facility. Extended following all passenger service ended around 1970, the Station Job continued to &quottie up&quot here, in Track 5. When not switching passenger trains, on first trick (daytime) it switched industries in the Blanding Street-Laurel Street region, and on third trick (&quotgraveyard&quot shift) it switched industries in the area now identified as &quotThe Vista,&quot behind Adluh Flour, and the Freight Depot at 800 Gervais Street.


The Station Job is now, like the passenger trains it after switched, history, but I feel its little brick crew area nevertheless stands, on Assembly Street near The Sonic Drive-In Restaurant.


Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center: primary hall panorama (P-40 et al)
prototype machine shop

Image by Chris Devers
See more pictures of this, and the Wikipedia post.


Details, quoting from Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum | Curtiss P-40E Warhawk (Kittyhawk IA):


Whether known as the Warhawk, Tomahawk, or Kittyhawk, the Curtiss P-40 proved to be a productive, versatile fighter in the course of the very first half of Globe War II. The shark-mouthed Tomahawks that Gen. Claire Chennault’s &quotFlying Tigers&quot flew in China against the Japanese remain amongst the most popular airplanes of the war. P-40E pilot Lt. Boyd D. Wagner became the initial American ace of Planet War II when he shot down six Japanese aircraft in the Philippines in mid-December 1941.


Curtiss-Wright built this airplane as Model 87-A3 and delivered it to Canada as a Kittyhawk I in 1941. It served until 1946 in No. 111 Squadron, Royal Canadian Air Force. U.S. Air Force personnel at Andrews Air Force Base restored it in 1975 to represent an aircraft of the 75th Fighter Squadron, 23rd Fighter Group, 14th Air Force.


Donated by the Exchange Club in Memory of Kellis Forbes.


Manufacturer:
Curtiss Aircraft Company


Date:

1939


Country of Origin:

United States of America


Dimensions:

General: 330 x 970cm, 2686kg, 1140cm (10ft 9 15/16in. x 31ft 9 7/8in., 5921.6lb., 37ft 4 13/16in.)


Materials:

All-metal, semi-monocoque


Physical Description:

Single engine, single seat, fighter aircraft.



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Super-quickly charging aluminium batteries ready to take on lithium

Super-fast charging aluminium batteries ready to take on lithium

But now Hongjie Dai and colleagues at Stanford University in California unveil a prototype battery with a new graphite cathode that solves these difficulties. The group&#39s discovery of the remarkable properties of graphite started with a stroke of luck.
Study a lot more on Royal Society of Chemistry


Wearable Bracelet Device That Cools, Heats Skin for Comfort Wins Proto Labs

Award manufacturing grant for numerous custom prototype components from Proto Labs such as CNC-machined aluminum enclosures and Santoprene bottom elements. “The prototypes we have built out from Proto Labs&#39 manufactured parts have been the best&nbsp…
Study more on MarketWatch


MSU Blackstone LaunchPad advisees blast past startup fundraising goal by 5000

Matt and Michelle Hertel pose with the prototype of the desktop personal computer-driven mill that is the inspiration for their startup business Pocket NC. Pocket NC, an advisee of the Blackstone LaunchPad at Montana State University, successfully closed out a&nbsp…
Study far more on Montana State University



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

Logitech Acoustics Engineering Lab Tour &amp How the G633, G933 Headsets Had been Made

Logitech Acoustics Engineering Lab Tour &amp How the G633, G933 Headsets Have been Made

Preceding facility tours have brought us to NVIDIA&#39s silicon failure analysis lab and Kingston&#39s automated SMT line, pulling the curtains aside for an inside look at how devices are produced. Yesterday, we toured Logitech&#39s acoustics engineering and …
Read a lot more on GamersNexus


Kemper &#39clean coal&#39 project shows the pricey perils of getting &#39first of its sort&#39

It was the afternoon of April 30, 2014, and Southern Co. CEO Tom Fanning as soon as once more was explaining to investors why the company had to write off millions of dollars for its subsequent-generation coal-gasification project in Mississippi. In addition to the expense …
Read more on Atmosphere & Power Publishing



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

Lastest Rapid Prototyping Methods News

3D printing of healthcare devices reached peak hype: Gartner

There is still speedy advancement outside of health-related fields. Even though 3D prototyping has for a lot of years been the only mainstream use of the technology, within the subsequent two to five years it is likely to be joined by numerous technologies that will spur much …
Study a lot more on Firstpost


3D printing of health-related devices reaches peak hype: Gartner

There is nevertheless fast advancement outside of medical fields. Whilst 3D prototyping has for many years been the only mainstream use of the technologies, inside the next two to 5 years it is most likely to be joined by a lot of technologies that will spur much …
Study a lot more on Firstpost


Certain Surface Region Measurement of Intact Lyophilized Cakes

Attainable variations originating from non-standardized extraction approaches used for removing cake from the vials might supply much less reputable information about the surface location of the material being analyzed. Micromeritics has designed a particular prototype&nbsp…
Study more on Azom.com


Digital Orthodontics Marketplace &amp Industry Analysis 2015 by IndustryArc

Digital Orthodontics as a tool has the potential to replace the standard techniques in the future, simply because the technologies is estimated to rapidly change the way orthodontics is viewed presently. … The design and style is then tested with the aid of prototyping.
Study much more on Medgadget.com (blog)



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

Friday, August 28, 2015

Astoria Scum River Bridge

A few nice rapid prototype price images I identified:


Astoria Scum River Bridge
rapid prototype cost

Image by jasoneppink

For far more than twenty years, a leaky pipe on 33rd Street beneath the Hell Gate Bridge viaduct strategy submerged a lot more than a hundred square feet of heavily-trafficked sidewalk below a festering cesspool of standing water. Astoria Scum River, as it was called, stretched the complete width of the sidewalk, and as winter approached, the river iced over and became particularly hazardous to cross.


Astoria Scum River Bridge was constructed to offer you Astorians an chance to safely cross this hazard. The unauthorized bridge was a gift to the pedestrians of Astoria in the absence of profitable municipal efforts to ameliorate the difficulty.


The bridge was produced at zero price entirely from recycled supplies: an old perform bench identified on the curb, rescued screws from a disassembled desk, and a metal plate from an expired electrical component. It was installed and devoted on December 30th, 2009.


On January 25th, 2010, Astoria Scum River Bridge was the topic of a commendation from the office of NYC Council Member Peter F. Vallone, Jr., accompanied by a pledge to perform with Amtrak to re-route Astoria Scum River off the sidewalk.


Two days later, Amtrak workers began construction operate. Astoria Scum River was swiftly routed off the sidewalk, and inside a couple months, custom-produced grates have been installed to complete the project. The bridge, no longer necessary, was de-installed on March 20th, 2010 and returned to the curb whence it came.


Astoria Scum River Bridge is an unauthorized city improvement by Jason Eppink and Posterchild.


Astoria Scum River Bridge
rapid prototype cost

Image by jasoneppink

For far more than twenty years, a leaky pipe on 33rd Street beneath the Hell Gate Bridge viaduct approach submerged much more than a hundred square feet of heavily-trafficked sidewalk below a festering cesspool of standing water. Astoria Scum River, as it was named, stretched the whole width of the sidewalk, and as winter approached, the river iced over and became especially hazardous to cross.


Astoria Scum River Bridge was constructed to supply Astorians an opportunity to safely cross this hazard. The unauthorized bridge was a gift to the pedestrians of Astoria in the absence of productive municipal efforts to ameliorate the dilemma.


The bridge was made at zero expense entirely from recycled supplies: an old perform bench discovered on the curb, rescued screws from a disassembled desk, and a metal plate from an expired electrical component. It was installed and dedicated on December 30th, 2009.


On January 25th, 2010, Astoria Scum River Bridge was the topic of a commendation from the workplace of NYC Council Member Peter F. Vallone, Jr., accompanied by a pledge to work with Amtrak to re-route Astoria Scum River off the sidewalk.


Two days later, Amtrak workers began building perform. Astoria Scum River was speedily routed off the sidewalk, and within a couple months, custom-made grates have been installed to complete the project. The bridge, no longer required, was de-installed on March 20th, 2010 and returned to the curb whence it came.


Astoria Scum River Bridge is an unauthorized city improvement by Jason Eppink and Posterchild.


Astoria Scum River Bridge
rapid prototype cost

Image by jasoneppink

For much more than twenty years, a leaky pipe on 33rd Street beneath the Hell Gate Bridge viaduct approach submerged a lot more than a hundred square feet of heavily-trafficked sidewalk beneath a festering cesspool of standing water. Astoria Scum River, as it was called, stretched the entire width of the sidewalk, and as winter approached, the river iced over and became especially hazardous to cross.


Astoria Scum River Bridge was constructed to supply Astorians an opportunity to safely cross this hazard. The unauthorized bridge was a present to the pedestrians of Astoria in the absence of successful municipal efforts to ameliorate the difficulty.


The bridge was created at zero expense completely from recycled materials: an old operate bench discovered on the curb, rescued screws from a disassembled desk, and a metal plate from an expired electrical element. It was installed and committed on December 30th, 2009.


On January 25th, 2010, Astoria Scum River Bridge was the topic of a commendation from the office of NYC Council Member Peter F. Vallone, Jr., accompanied by a pledge to perform with Amtrak to re-route Astoria Scum River off the sidewalk.


Two days later, Amtrak workers started construction work. Astoria Scum River was rapidly routed off the sidewalk, and inside a couple months, custom-created grates had been installed to complete the project. The bridge, no longer needed, was de-installed on March 20th, 2010 and returned to the curb whence it came.


Astoria Scum River Bridge is an unauthorized city improvement by Jason Eppink and Posterchild.



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)

Cool Speedy Prototype Expense pictures

Some cool rapid prototype cost images:


Marine Week Boston, 2010: Bell-Boeing MV-22B Osprey cockpit, looking at the entrance to the Boston Common parking garage
rapid prototype cost

Image by Chris Devers

Pasted from Wikipedia: Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey


• • • • •


The Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey is a multi-mission, military, tiltrotor aircraft with both a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL), and short takeoff and landing (STOL) capability. It is designed to combine the functionality of a conventional helicopter with the long-range, high-speed cruise performance of a turboprop aircraft.


The V-22 originated from the U.S. Department of Defense Joint-service Vertical take-off/landing Experimental (JVX) aircraft program started in 1981. It was developed jointly by the Bell Helicopter, and Boeing Helicopters team, known as Bell Boeing, which produce the aircraft.[4] The V-22 first flew in 1989, and began years of flight testing and design alterations.


The United States Marine Corps began crew training for the Osprey in 2000, and fielded it in 2007. The Osprey’s other operator, the U.S. Air Force fielded their version of the tiltrotor in 2009. Since entering service with the U.S. Marine Corps and Air Force, the Osprey has been deployed for combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.


Contents


1 Development

•• 1.1 Early development

•• 1.2 Flight testing and design changes

•• 1.3 Controversy

•• 1.4 Recent development

2 Design

3 Operational history

•• 3.1 US Marine Corps

•• 3.2 US Air Force

•• 3.3 Potential operators

4 Variants

5 Operators

6 Notable accidents

7 Specifications (MV-22B)

8 Notable appearances in media

9 See also

10 References

11 External links


Development


Early development


The failure of the Iran hostage rescue mission in 1980 demonstrated to the United States military a need[5] for "a new type of aircraft, that could not only take off and land vertically but also could carry combat troops, and do so at speed."[6] The U.S. Department of Defense began the Joint-service Vertical take-off/landing Experimental (JVX) aircraft program in 1981, under U.S. Army leadership. Later the U.S. Navy/Marine Corps took the lead.[7][8] The JVX combined requirements from the Marine Corps, Air Force, Army and Navy.[9][10] A request for proposals (RFP) was issued in December 1982 for JVX preliminary design work. Interest in the program was expressed by Aérospatiale, Bell Helicopter, Boeing Vertol, Grumman, Lockheed, and Westland. The DoD pushed for contractors to form teams. Bell partnered with Boeing Vertol. The Bell Boeing team submitted a proposal for a enlarged version of the Bell XV-15 prototype on 17 February 1983. This was the only proposal received and a preliminary design contract was awarded on 26 April 1983.[11][12]


The JVX aircraft was designated V-22 Osprey on 15 January 1985; by March that same year the first six prototypes were being produced, and Boeing Vertol was expanded to deal with the project workload.[13][14] Work has been split evenly between Bell and Boeing. Bell Helicopter manufactures and integrates the wing, nacelles, rotors, drive system, tail surfaces, and aft ramp, as well as integrates the Rolls-Royce engines and performs final assembly. Boeing Helicopters manufactures and integrates the fuselage, cockpit, avionics, and flight controls.[4][15] The USMC variant of the Osprey received the MV-22 designation and the Air Force variant received CV-22; reversed from normal procedure to prevent Marine Ospreys from having a conflicting designation with aircraft carriers (CV).[16] Full-scale development of the V-22 tilt-rotor aircraft began in 1986.[2] On 3 May 1986 the Bell-Boeing partnership was awarded a .714 billion contract for V-22 aircraft by the Navy, thus at this point the project had acquisition plans with all four arms of the U.S. military.[17]


The first V-22 was rolled out with significant media attention in May 1988.[18][19] However the project suffered several political blows. Firstly in the same year, the Army left the program, citing a need to focus its budget on more immediate aviation programs.[20] The project also faced considerable dialogue in the Senate, surviving two votes that both could have resulted in cancellation.[21][22] Despite the Senate’s decision, the Department of Defense instructed the Navy not to spend more money on the Osprey.[23] At the same time, the Bush administration sought the cancellation of the project.[23]


Flight testing and design changes


The first of six MV-22 prototypes first flew on 19 March 1989 in the helicopter mode,[24] and on 14 September 1989 as a fixed-wing plane.[25] The third and fourth prototypes successfully completed the Osprey’s first Sea Trials on the USS Wasp in December 1990.[26] However, the fourth and fifth prototypes crashed in 1991-92.[27] Flight tests were resumed in August 1993 after changes were incorporated in the prototypes.[2] From October 1992 until April 1993, Bell and Boeing redesigned the V-22 to reduce empty weight, simplify manufacture and reduce production costs. This redesigned version became the B-model.[28]


Flight testing of four full-scale development V-22s began in early 1997 when the first pre-production V-22 was delivered to the Naval Air Warfare Test Center, Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland. The first EMD flight took place on 5 February 1997. The first of four low rate initial production aircraft, ordered on 28 April 1997, was delivered on 27 May 1999. Osprey number 10 completed the program’s second Sea Trials, this time from the USS Saipan in January 1999.[2] During external load testing in April 1999, Boeing used a V-22 to lift and transport the M777 howitzer.[29] In 2000, Boeing announced that the V-22 would be fitted with a nose-mounted GAU-19 Gatling gun,[30] but the GAU-19 gun was later canceled.[31]


In 2000, there were two further fatal crashes, killing a total of 19 Marines, and the production was again halted while the cause of these crashes was investigated and various parts were redesigned.[32] The V-22 completed its final operational evaluation in June 2005. The evaluation was deemed successful; events included long range deployments, high altitude, desert and shipboard operations. The problems identified in various accidents had been addressed.[33]


Controversy


The V-22’s development process has been long and controversial, partly due to its large cost increases.[34] When the development budget, first planned for .5 billion in 1986, increased to a projected billion in 1988, then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney tried to zero out its funding. He was eventually overruled by Congress.[32] As of 2008, billion have been spent on the Osprey program and another .2 billion will be required to complete planned production numbers by the end of the program.[2]


The V-22 squadron’s former commander at Marine Corps Air Station New River, Lt. Colonel Odin Lieberman, was relieved of duty in 2001 after allegations that he instructed his unit that they needed to falsify maintenance records to make the plane appear more reliable.[2][35] Three officers were later implicated in the falsification scandal.[34]


The aircraft is incapable of autorotation, and is therefore unable to land safely in helicopter mode if both engines fail. A director of the Pentagon’s testing office in 2005 said that if the Osprey loses power while flying like a helicopter below 1,600 feet (490 m), emergency landings "are not likely to be survivable". But Captain Justin (Moon) McKinney, a V-22 pilot, says that this will not be a problem, "We can turn it into a plane and glide it down, just like a C-130".[31] A complete loss of power would require the failure of both engines, as a drive shaft connects the nacelles through the wing; one engine can power both proprotors.[36] While vortex ring state (VRS) contributed to a deadly V-22 accident, the aircraft is less susceptible to the condition than conventional helicopters and recovers more quickly.[5] The Marines now train new pilots in the recognition of and recovery from VRS and have instituted operational envelope limits and instrumentation to help pilots avoid VRS conditions.[32][37]


It was planned in 2000 to equip all V-22s with a nose-mounted Gatling gun, to provide "the V-22 with a strong defensive firepower capability to greatly increase the aircraft’s survivability in hostile actions."[30] The nose gun project was canceled however, leading to criticism by retired Marine Corps Commandant General James L. Jones, who is not satisfied with the current V-22 armament.[31] A belly-mounted turret was later installed on some of the first V-22s sent to the War in Afghanistan in 2009.[38]


With the first combat deployment of the MV-22 in October 2007, Time Magazine ran an article condemning the aircraft as unsafe, overpriced, and completely inadequate.[31] The Marine Corps, however, responded with the assertion that much of the article’s data were dated, obsolete, inaccurate, and reflected expectations that ran too high for any new field of aircraft.[39]


Recent development


On 28 September 2005, the Pentagon formally approved full-rate production for the V-22.[40] The plan is to boost production from 11 a year to between 24 and 48 a year by 2012. Of the 458 total planned, 360 are for the Marine Corps, 48 for the Navy, and 50 for the Air Force at an average cost of 0 million per aircraft, including development costs.[2] The V-22 had an incremental flyaway cost of million per aircraft in 2007,[3] but the Navy hopes to shave about million off that cost after a five-year production contract starts in 2008.[41]


The Bell-Boeing Joint Project Office in Amarillo, Texas will design a new integrated avionics processor to resolve electronics obsolescence issues and add new network capabilities.[42]


Design


The Osprey is the world’s first production tiltrotor aircraft, with one three-bladed proprotor, turboprop engine, and transmission nacelle mounted on each wingtip. It is classified as a powered lift aircraft by the Federal Aviation Administration.[43] For takeoff and landing, it typically operates as a helicopter with the nacelles vertical (rotors horizontal). Once airborne, the nacelles rotate forward 90° in as little as 12 seconds for horizontal flight, converting the V-22 to a more fuel-efficient, higher-speed turboprop airplane. STOL rolling-takeoff and landing capability is achieved by having the nacelles tilted forward up to 45°. For compact storage and transport, the V-22’s wing rotates to align, front-to-back, with the fuselage. The proprotors can also fold in a sequence taking 90 seconds.[44]


Most Osprey missions will use fixed wing flight 75 percent or more of the time, reducing wear and tear on the aircraft and reducing operational costs.[45] This fixed wing flight is higher than typical helicopter missions allowing longer range line-of-sight communications and so improved command and control.[2] Boeing has stated the V-22 design loses 10% of its vertical lift over a Tiltwing design when operating in helicopter mode because of airflow resistance due to the wings, but that the Tiltrotor design has better short takeoff and landing performance.[46]


The V-22 is equipped with a glass cockpit, which incorporates four Multi-function displays (MFDs) and one shared Central Display Unit (CDU), allowing the pilots to display a variety of images including: digimaps centered or decentered on current position, FLIR imagery, primary flight instruments, navigation (TACAN, VOR, ILS, GPS, INS), and system status. The flight director panel of the Cockpit Management System (CMS) allows for fully-coupled (aka: autopilot) functions which will take the aircraft from forward flight into a 50-foot hover with no pilot interaction other than programming the system.[47] The glass cockpit of the canceled CH-46X was derived from the V-22.[48]


The V-22 is a fly-by-wire aircraft with triple-redundant flight control systems.[49] With the nacelles pointing straight up in conversion mode at 90° the flight computers command the aircraft to fly like a helicopter, with cyclic forces being applied to a conventional swashplate at the rotor hub. With the nacelles in airplane mode (0°) the flaperons, rudder, and elevator fly the aircraft like an airplane. This is a gradual transition and occurs over the rotation range of the nacelles. The lower the nacelles, the greater effect of the airplane-mode control surfaces.[50] The nacelles can rotate past vertical to 97.5° for rearward flight.[51][52]


The Osprey can be armed with one M240 7.62x51mm NATO (.308 in caliber) or M2 .50 in caliber (12.7 mm) machine gun on the loading ramp, that can be fired rearward when the ramp is lowered. A GAU-19 three-barrel .50 in gatling gun mounted below the V-22’s nose has also been studied for future upgrade.[31][53] BAE Systems developed a remotely operated turreted weapons system for the V-22,[54] which was installed on half of the first V-22s deployed to Afghanistan in 2009.[38] The 7.62 mm belly gun turret is remotely operated by a gunner inside the aircraft, who acquires targets with a separate pod using color television and forward looking infrared imagery.


U.S. Naval Air Systems Command is working on upgrades to increase the maximum speed from 250 knots (460 km/h; 290 mph) to 270 knots (500 km/h; 310 mph), increase helicopter mode altitude limit from 10,000 feet (3,000 m) to 12,000 feet (3,700 m) or 14,000 feet (4,300 m), and increase lift performance.[55]


Operational history


US Marine Corps


Marine Corps crew training on the Osprey has been conducted by VMMT-204 since March 2000. On 3 June 2005, the Marine Corps helicopter squadron Marine Medium Helicopter 263 (HMM-263), stood down to begin the process of transitioning to the MV-22 Osprey.[56] On 8 December 2005, Lieutenant General Amos, commander of the II MEF, accepted the delivery of the first fleet of MV-22s, delivered to HMM-263. The unit reactivated on 3 March 2006 as the first MV-22 squadron and was redesignated VMM-263. On 31 August 2006, VMM-162 (the former HMM-162) followed suit. On 23 March 2007, HMM-266 became Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 266 (VMM-266) at Marine Corps Air Station New River, North Carolina.[57]


The Osprey has been replacing existing CH-46 Sea Knight squadrons.[58] The MV-22 reached initial operational capability (IOC) with the U.S. Marine Corps on 13 June 2007.[1] On 10 July 2007 an MV-22 Osprey landed aboard the Royal Navy aircraft carrier, HMS Illustrious in the Atlantic Ocean. This marked the first time a V-22 had landed on any non-U.S. vessel.[59]


On 13 April 2007, the U.S. Marine Corps announced that it would be sending ten V-22 aircraft to Iraq, the Osprey’s first combat deployment. Marine Corps Commandant, General James Conway, indicated that over 150 Marines would accompany the Osprey set for September deployment to Al-Asad Airfield.[60][61] On 17 September 2007, ten MV-22Bs of VMM-263 left for Iraq aboard the USS Wasp. The decision to use a ship rather than use the Osprey’s self-deployment capability was made because of concerns over icing during the North Atlantic portion of the trip, lack of available KC-130s for mid-air refueling, and the availability of the USS Wasp.[62]


The Osprey has provided support in Iraq, racking up some 2,000 flight hours over three months with a mission capable availability rate of 68.1% as of late-January 2008.[63] They are primarily used in Iraq’s western Anbar province for routine cargo and troop movements, and also for riskier "aero-scout" missions. General David Petraeus, the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, used one to fly around Iraq on Christmas Day 2007 to visit troops.[64] Then-presidential candidate Barack Obama also flew in Ospreys during his high profile 2008 tour of Iraq.[65]


The only major problem has been obtaining the necessary spare parts to maintain the aircraft.[66] The V-22 had flown 3,000 sorties totaling 5,200 hours in Iraq as of July 2008.[67] USMC leadership expect to deploy MV-22s to Afghanistan in 2009.[66][68] General George J. Trautman, III praised the increased range of the V-22 over the legacy helicopters in Iraq and said that "it turned his battle space from the size of Texas into the size of Rhode Island."[69]


Naval Air Systems Command has devised a temporary fix for sailors to place portable heat shields under Osprey engines to prevent damage to the decks of some of the Navy’s smaller amphibious ships, but they determined that a long term solution to the problem would require these decks be redesigned with heat resistant deck coatings, passive thermal barriers and changes in ship structure in order to operate V-22s and F-35Bs.[70]


A Government Accountability Office study reported that by January 2009 the Marines had 12 MV-22s operating in Iraq and they managed to successfully complete all assigned missions. The same report found that the V-22 deployments had mission capable rates averaging 57% to 68% and an overall full mission capable rate of only 6%. It also stated that the aircraft had shown weakness in situational awareness, maintenance, shipboard operations and the ability to transport troops and external cargo.[71] That study also concluded that the "deployments confirmed that the V-22’s enhanced speed and range enable personnel and internal cargo to be transported faster and farther than is possible with the legacy helicopters it is replacing".[71]


The MV-22 saw its first offensive combat mission, Operation Cobra’s Anger on 4 December 2009. Ospreys assisted in inserting 1,000 Marines and 150 Afghan troops into the Now Zad Valley of Helmand Province in southern Afghanistan to disrupt communication and supply lines of the Taliban.[38] In January 2010 the MV-22 Osprey is being sent to Haiti as part of Operation Unified Response relief efforts after the earthquake there. This will be the first use the Marine V-22 in a humanitarian mission.[72]


US Air Force


The Air Force’s first operational CV-22 Osprey was delivered to the 58th Special Operations Wing (58th SOW) at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico on 20 March 2006. This and subsequent aircraft will become part of the 58th SOW’s fleet of aircraft used for training pilots and crew members for special operations use.[73] On 16 November 2006, the Air Force officially accepted the CV-22 in a ceremony conducted at Hurlburt Field, Florida.[74]


The US Air Force’s first operational deployment of the Osprey sent four CV-22s to Mali in November 2008 in support of Exercise Flintlock. The CV-22s flew nonstop from Hurlburt Field, Florida with in-flight refueling.[5] AFSOC declared that the 8th Special Operations Squadron reached Initial Operational Capability on 16 March 2009, with six of its planned nine CV-22s operational.[75]


In June 2009, CV-22s of the 8th Special Operations Squadron delivered 43,000 pounds (20,000 kg) of humanitarian supplies to remote villages in Honduras that were not accessible by conventional vehicles.[76] In November 2009, the 8th SO Squadron and its six CV-22s returned from a three-month deployment in Iraq.[77]


The first possible combat loss of an Osprey occurred on 9 April, 2010, as a CV-22 went down near Qalat, Zabul Province, Afghanistan, killing four.[78][79]


Potential operators


In 1999 the V-22 was studied for use in the United Kingdom’s Royal Navy,[80] it has been raised several times as a candidate for the role of Maritime Airborne Surveillance and Control (MASC).[81]


Israel had shown interest in the purchase of MV-22s, but no order was placed.[82][83] Flightglobal reported in late 2009 that Israel has decided to wait for the CH-53K instead.[84]


The V-22 Osprey is a candidate for the Norwegian All Weather Search and Rescue Helicopter (NAWSARH) that is planned to replace the Westland Sea King Mk.43B of the Royal Norwegian Air Force in 2015.[85] The other candidates for the NAWSARH contract of 10-12 helicopters are AgustaWestland AW101 Merlin, Eurocopter EC225, NHIndustries NH90 and Sikorsky S-92.[86]


Bell Boeing has made an unsolicited offer of the V-22 for US Army medical evacuation needs.[87] However the Joint Personnel Recovery Agency issued a report that said that a common helicopter design would be needed for both combat recovery and medical evacuation and that the V-22 would not be suitable for recovery missions because of the difficulty of hoist operations and lack of self-defense capabilities.[88]


The US Navy remains a potential user of the V-22, but its role and mission with the Navy remains unclear. The latest proposal is to replace the C-2 Greyhound with the V-22 in the fleet logistics role. The V-22 would have the advantage of being able to land on and support non-carriers with rapid delivery of supplies and people between the ships of a taskforce or to ships on patrol beyond helicopter range.[89] Loren B. Thompson of the Lexington Institute has suggested V-22s for use in combat search and rescue and Marine One VIP transport, which also need replacement aircraft.[90]


Variants


V-22A 

•• Pre-production full-scale development aircraft used for flight testing. These are unofficially considered A-variants after 1993 redesign.[91]


HV-22 

•• The U.S. Navy considered an HV-22 to provide combat search and rescue, delivery and retrieval of special warfare teams along with fleet logistic support transport. However, it chose the MH-60S for this role in 1992.[92]


SV-22 

•• The proposed anti-submarine warfare Navy variant. The Navy studied the SV-22 in the 1980s to replace S-3 and SH-2 aircraft.[93]


MV-22B 

•• Basic U.S. Marine Corps transport; original requirement for 552 (now 360). The Marine Corps is the lead service in the development of the V-22 Osprey. The Marine Corps variant, the MV-22B, is an assault transport for troops, equipment and supplies, capable of operating from ships or from expeditionary airfields ashore. It is replacing the Marine Corps’ CH-46E[57] and CH-53D.[94]


CV-22B 

•• Air Force variant for the U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM). It will conduct long-range, special operations missions, and is equipped with extra fuel tanks and terrain-following radar.[95][96]


Operators


 United States


United States Air Force


•• 8th Special Operations Squadron (8 SOS) at Hurlburt Field, Florida

•• 71st Special Operations Squadron (71 SOS) at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico

•• 20th Special Operations Squadron (20 SOS) at Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico


United States Marine Corps


•• VMM-161

•• VMM-162

•• VMM-261

•• VMM-263

•• VMM-264

•• VMM-266

•• VMM-365

•• VMMT-204 – Training squadron

•• VMX-22 – Marine Tiltrotor Operational Test and Evaluation Squadron


Notable accidents


Main article: Accidents and incidents involving the V-22 Osprey


From 1991 to 2000 there were four significant crashes, and a total of 30 fatalities, during testing.[32] Since becoming operational in 2007, the V-22 has had one possible combat loss due to an unknown cause, no losses due to accidents, and seven other notable, but minor, incidents.


• On 11 June 1991, a mis-wired flight control system led to two minor injuries when the left nacelle struck the ground while the aircraft was hovering 15 feet (4.6 m) in the air, causing it to bounce and catch fire.[97]


• On 20 July 1992, a leaking gearbox led to a fire in the right nacelle, causing the aircraft to drop into the Potomac River in front of an audience of Congressmen and other government officials at Quantico, killing all seven on board and grounding the aircraft for 11 months.[98]


• On 8 April 2000, a V-22 loaded with Marines to simulate a rescue, attempted to land at Marana Northwest Regional Airport in Arizona, stalled when its right rotor entered vortex ring state, rolled over, crashed, and exploded, killing all 19 on board.[37]


• On 11 December 2000, after a catastrophic hydraulic leak and subsequent software instrument failure, a V-22 fell 1,600 feet (490 m) into a forest in Jacksonville, North Carolina, killing all four aboard. This caused the Marine Corps to ground their fleet of eight V-22s, the second grounding that year.[99][100]


Specifications (MV-22B)


Data from Boeing Integrated Defense Systems,[101] Naval Air Systems Command,[102] US Air Force CV-22 fact sheet,[95] Norton,[103] and Bell[104]


General characteristics


Crew: Four (pilot, copilot and two flight engineers)

Capacity: 24 troops (seated), 32 troops (floor loaded) or up to 15,000 lb (6,800 kg) of cargo (dual hook)

Length: 57 ft 4 in (17.5 m)

Rotor diameter: 38 ft 0 in (11.6 m)

Wingspan: 45 ft 10 in (14 m)

Width with rotors: 84 ft 7 in (25.8 m)

Height: 22 ft 1 in/6.73 m; overall with nacelles vertical (17 ft 11 in/5.5 m; at top of tailfins)

Disc area: 2,268 ft² (212 m²)

Wing area: 301.4 ft² (28 m²)

Empty weight: 33,140 lb (15,032 kg)

Loaded weight: 47,500 lb (21,500 kg)

Max takeoff weight: 60,500 lb (27,400 kg)

Powerplant:Rolls-Royce Allison T406/AE 1107C-Liberty turboshafts, 6,150 hp (4,590 kW) each


Performance


Maximum speed: 250 knots (460 km/h, 290 mph) at sea level / 305 kn (565 km/h; 351 mph) at 15,000 ft (4,600 m)[105]

Cruise speed: 241 knots (277 mph, 446 km/h) at sea level

Range: 879 nmi (1,011 mi, 1,627 km)

Combat radius: 370 nmi (426 mi, 685 km)

Ferry range: 1,940 nmi (with auxiliary internal fuel tanks)

Service ceiling: 26,000 ft (7,925 m)

Rate of climb: 2,320 ft/min (11.8 m/s)

Disc loading: 20.9 lb/ft² at 47,500 lb GW (102.23 kg/m²)

Power/mass: 0.259 hp/lb (427 W/kg)


Armament


• 1× M240 machine gun on ramp, optional


Notable appearances in media


Main article: Aircraft in fiction#V-22 Osprey


See also


Elizabeth A. Okoreeh-Baah, USMC – first female to pilot a V-22 Osprey


Related development


Bell XV-15[106]

Bell/Agusta BA609

Bell Boeing Quad TiltRotor


Comparable aircraft


Canadair CL-84

LTV XC-142


Related lists


List of military aircraft of the United States

List of VTOL aircraft


References


Bibliography


• Markman, Steve and Bill Holder. "Bell/Boeing V-22 Osprey Tilt-Engine VTOL Transport (U.S.A.)". Straight Up: A History of Vertical Flight. Schiffer Publishing, 2000. ISBN 0-7643-1204-9.

• Norton, Bill. Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey, Tiltrotor Tactical Transport. Midland Publishing, 2004. ISBN 1-85780-165-2.


External links


Wikimedia Commons has media related to: V-22 Osprey


Official Boeing V-22 site

Official Bell V-22 site

V-22 Osprey web, and www.history.navy.mil/planes/v-22.html

CV-22 fact sheet on USAF site

www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/v-22.htm

www.airforce-technology.com/projects/osprey/

Onward and Upward

"Flight of the Osprey", US Navy video of V-22 operations


Marine Week Boston, 2010: Bell-Boeing MV-22B Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft taking off from Boston Common
rapid prototype cost

Image by Chris Devers

Pasted from Wikipedia: Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey


• • • • •


The Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey is a multi-mission, military, tiltrotor aircraft with both a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL), and short takeoff and landing (STOL) capability. It is designed to combine the functionality of a conventional helicopter with the long-range, high-speed cruise performance of a turboprop aircraft.


The V-22 originated from the U.S. Department of Defense Joint-service Vertical take-off/landing Experimental (JVX) aircraft program started in 1981. It was developed jointly by the Bell Helicopter, and Boeing Helicopters team, known as Bell Boeing, which produce the aircraft.[4] The V-22 first flew in 1989, and began years of flight testing and design alterations.


The United States Marine Corps began crew training for the Osprey in 2000, and fielded it in 2007. The Osprey’s other operator, the U.S. Air Force fielded their version of the tiltrotor in 2009. Since entering service with the U.S. Marine Corps and Air Force, the Osprey has been deployed for combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.


Contents


1 Development

•• 1.1 Early development

•• 1.2 Flight testing and design changes

•• 1.3 Controversy

•• 1.4 Recent development

2 Design

3 Operational history

•• 3.1 US Marine Corps

•• 3.2 US Air Force

•• 3.3 Potential operators

4 Variants

5 Operators

6 Notable accidents

7 Specifications (MV-22B)

8 Notable appearances in media

9 See also

10 References

11 External links


Development


Early development


The failure of the Iran hostage rescue mission in 1980 demonstrated to the United States military a need[5] for "a new type of aircraft, that could not only take off and land vertically but also could carry combat troops, and do so at speed."[6] The U.S. Department of Defense began the Joint-service Vertical take-off/landing Experimental (JVX) aircraft program in 1981, under U.S. Army leadership. Later the U.S. Navy/Marine Corps took the lead.[7][8] The JVX combined requirements from the Marine Corps, Air Force, Army and Navy.[9][10] A request for proposals (RFP) was issued in December 1982 for JVX preliminary design work. Interest in the program was expressed by Aérospatiale, Bell Helicopter, Boeing Vertol, Grumman, Lockheed, and Westland. The DoD pushed for contractors to form teams. Bell partnered with Boeing Vertol. The Bell Boeing team submitted a proposal for a enlarged version of the Bell XV-15 prototype on 17 February 1983. This was the only proposal received and a preliminary design contract was awarded on 26 April 1983.[11][12]


The JVX aircraft was designated V-22 Osprey on 15 January 1985; by March that same year the first six prototypes were being produced, and Boeing Vertol was expanded to deal with the project workload.[13][14] Work has been split evenly between Bell and Boeing. Bell Helicopter manufactures and integrates the wing, nacelles, rotors, drive system, tail surfaces, and aft ramp, as well as integrates the Rolls-Royce engines and performs final assembly. Boeing Helicopters manufactures and integrates the fuselage, cockpit, avionics, and flight controls.[4][15] The USMC variant of the Osprey received the MV-22 designation and the Air Force variant received CV-22; reversed from normal procedure to prevent Marine Ospreys from having a conflicting designation with aircraft carriers (CV).[16] Full-scale development of the V-22 tilt-rotor aircraft began in 1986.[2] On 3 May 1986 the Bell-Boeing partnership was awarded a .714 billion contract for V-22 aircraft by the Navy, thus at this point the project had acquisition plans with all four arms of the U.S. military.[17]


The first V-22 was rolled out with significant media attention in May 1988.[18][19] However the project suffered several political blows. Firstly in the same year, the Army left the program, citing a need to focus its budget on more immediate aviation programs.[20] The project also faced considerable dialogue in the Senate, surviving two votes that both could have resulted in cancellation.[21][22] Despite the Senate’s decision, the Department of Defense instructed the Navy not to spend more money on the Osprey.[23] At the same time, the Bush administration sought the cancellation of the project.[23]


Flight testing and design changes


The first of six MV-22 prototypes first flew on 19 March 1989 in the helicopter mode,[24] and on 14 September 1989 as a fixed-wing plane.[25] The third and fourth prototypes successfully completed the Osprey’s first Sea Trials on the USS Wasp in December 1990.[26] However, the fourth and fifth prototypes crashed in 1991-92.[27] Flight tests were resumed in August 1993 after changes were incorporated in the prototypes.[2] From October 1992 until April 1993, Bell and Boeing redesigned the V-22 to reduce empty weight, simplify manufacture and reduce production costs. This redesigned version became the B-model.[28]


Flight testing of four full-scale development V-22s began in early 1997 when the first pre-production V-22 was delivered to the Naval Air Warfare Test Center, Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland. The first EMD flight took place on 5 February 1997. The first of four low rate initial production aircraft, ordered on 28 April 1997, was delivered on 27 May 1999. Osprey number 10 completed the program’s second Sea Trials, this time from the USS Saipan in January 1999.[2] During external load testing in April 1999, Boeing used a V-22 to lift and transport the M777 howitzer.[29] In 2000, Boeing announced that the V-22 would be fitted with a nose-mounted GAU-19 Gatling gun,[30] but the GAU-19 gun was later canceled.[31]


In 2000, there were two further fatal crashes, killing a total of 19 Marines, and the production was again halted while the cause of these crashes was investigated and various parts were redesigned.[32] The V-22 completed its final operational evaluation in June 2005. The evaluation was deemed successful; events included long range deployments, high altitude, desert and shipboard operations. The problems identified in various accidents had been addressed.[33]


Controversy


The V-22’s development process has been long and controversial, partly due to its large cost increases.[34] When the development budget, first planned for .5 billion in 1986, increased to a projected billion in 1988, then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney tried to zero out its funding. He was eventually overruled by Congress.[32] As of 2008, billion have been spent on the Osprey program and another .2 billion will be required to complete planned production numbers by the end of the program.[2]


The V-22 squadron’s former commander at Marine Corps Air Station New River, Lt. Colonel Odin Lieberman, was relieved of duty in 2001 after allegations that he instructed his unit that they needed to falsify maintenance records to make the plane appear more reliable.[2][35] Three officers were later implicated in the falsification scandal.[34]


The aircraft is incapable of autorotation, and is therefore unable to land safely in helicopter mode if both engines fail. A director of the Pentagon’s testing office in 2005 said that if the Osprey loses power while flying like a helicopter below 1,600 feet (490 m), emergency landings "are not likely to be survivable". But Captain Justin (Moon) McKinney, a V-22 pilot, says that this will not be a problem, "We can turn it into a plane and glide it down, just like a C-130".[31] A complete loss of power would require the failure of both engines, as a drive shaft connects the nacelles through the wing; one engine can power both proprotors.[36] While vortex ring state (VRS) contributed to a deadly V-22 accident, the aircraft is less susceptible to the condition than conventional helicopters and recovers more quickly.[5] The Marines now train new pilots in the recognition of and recovery from VRS and have instituted operational envelope limits and instrumentation to help pilots avoid VRS conditions.[32][37]


It was planned in 2000 to equip all V-22s with a nose-mounted Gatling gun, to provide "the V-22 with a strong defensive firepower capability to greatly increase the aircraft’s survivability in hostile actions."[30] The nose gun project was canceled however, leading to criticism by retired Marine Corps Commandant General James L. Jones, who is not satisfied with the current V-22 armament.[31] A belly-mounted turret was later installed on some of the first V-22s sent to the War in Afghanistan in 2009.[38]


With the first combat deployment of the MV-22 in October 2007, Time Magazine ran an article condemning the aircraft as unsafe, overpriced, and completely inadequate.[31] The Marine Corps, however, responded with the assertion that much of the article’s data were dated, obsolete, inaccurate, and reflected expectations that ran too high for any new field of aircraft.[39]


Recent development


On 28 September 2005, the Pentagon formally approved full-rate production for the V-22.[40] The plan is to boost production from 11 a year to between 24 and 48 a year by 2012. Of the 458 total planned, 360 are for the Marine Corps, 48 for the Navy, and 50 for the Air Force at an average cost of 0 million per aircraft, including development costs.[2] The V-22 had an incremental flyaway cost of million per aircraft in 2007,[3] but the Navy hopes to shave about million off that cost after a five-year production contract starts in 2008.[41]


The Bell-Boeing Joint Project Office in Amarillo, Texas will design a new integrated avionics processor to resolve electronics obsolescence issues and add new network capabilities.[42]


Design


The Osprey is the world’s first production tiltrotor aircraft, with one three-bladed proprotor, turboprop engine, and transmission nacelle mounted on each wingtip. It is classified as a powered lift aircraft by the Federal Aviation Administration.[43] For takeoff and landing, it typically operates as a helicopter with the nacelles vertical (rotors horizontal). Once airborne, the nacelles rotate forward 90° in as little as 12 seconds for horizontal flight, converting the V-22 to a more fuel-efficient, higher-speed turboprop airplane. STOL rolling-takeoff and landing capability is achieved by having the nacelles tilted forward up to 45°. For compact storage and transport, the V-22’s wing rotates to align, front-to-back, with the fuselage. The proprotors can also fold in a sequence taking 90 seconds.[44]


Most Osprey missions will use fixed wing flight 75 percent or more of the time, reducing wear and tear on the aircraft and reducing operational costs.[45] This fixed wing flight is higher than typical helicopter missions allowing longer range line-of-sight communications and so improved command and control.[2] Boeing has stated the V-22 design loses 10% of its vertical lift over a Tiltwing design when operating in helicopter mode because of airflow resistance due to the wings, but that the Tiltrotor design has better short takeoff and landing performance.[46]


The V-22 is equipped with a glass cockpit, which incorporates four Multi-function displays (MFDs) and one shared Central Display Unit (CDU), allowing the pilots to display a variety of images including: digimaps centered or decentered on current position, FLIR imagery, primary flight instruments, navigation (TACAN, VOR, ILS, GPS, INS), and system status. The flight director panel of the Cockpit Management System (CMS) allows for fully-coupled (aka: autopilot) functions which will take the aircraft from forward flight into a 50-foot hover with no pilot interaction other than programming the system.[47] The glass cockpit of the canceled CH-46X was derived from the V-22.[48]


The V-22 is a fly-by-wire aircraft with triple-redundant flight control systems.[49] With the nacelles pointing straight up in conversion mode at 90° the flight computers command the aircraft to fly like a helicopter, with cyclic forces being applied to a conventional swashplate at the rotor hub. With the nacelles in airplane mode (0°) the flaperons, rudder, and elevator fly the aircraft like an airplane. This is a gradual transition and occurs over the rotation range of the nacelles. The lower the nacelles, the greater effect of the airplane-mode control surfaces.[50] The nacelles can rotate past vertical to 97.5° for rearward flight.[51][52]


The Osprey can be armed with one M240 7.62x51mm NATO (.308 in caliber) or M2 .50 in caliber (12.7 mm) machine gun on the loading ramp, that can be fired rearward when the ramp is lowered. A GAU-19 three-barrel .50 in gatling gun mounted below the V-22’s nose has also been studied for future upgrade.[31][53] BAE Systems developed a remotely operated turreted weapons system for the V-22,[54] which was installed on half of the first V-22s deployed to Afghanistan in 2009.[38] The 7.62 mm belly gun turret is remotely operated by a gunner inside the aircraft, who acquires targets with a separate pod using color television and forward looking infrared imagery.


U.S. Naval Air Systems Command is working on upgrades to increase the maximum speed from 250 knots (460 km/h; 290 mph) to 270 knots (500 km/h; 310 mph), increase helicopter mode altitude limit from 10,000 feet (3,000 m) to 12,000 feet (3,700 m) or 14,000 feet (4,300 m), and increase lift performance.[55]


Operational history


US Marine Corps


Marine Corps crew training on the Osprey has been conducted by VMMT-204 since March 2000. On 3 June 2005, the Marine Corps helicopter squadron Marine Medium Helicopter 263 (HMM-263), stood down to begin the process of transitioning to the MV-22 Osprey.[56] On 8 December 2005, Lieutenant General Amos, commander of the II MEF, accepted the delivery of the first fleet of MV-22s, delivered to HMM-263. The unit reactivated on 3 March 2006 as the first MV-22 squadron and was redesignated VMM-263. On 31 August 2006, VMM-162 (the former HMM-162) followed suit. On 23 March 2007, HMM-266 became Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 266 (VMM-266) at Marine Corps Air Station New River, North Carolina.[57]


The Osprey has been replacing existing CH-46 Sea Knight squadrons.[58] The MV-22 reached initial operational capability (IOC) with the U.S. Marine Corps on 13 June 2007.[1] On 10 July 2007 an MV-22 Osprey landed aboard the Royal Navy aircraft carrier, HMS Illustrious in the Atlantic Ocean. This marked the first time a V-22 had landed on any non-U.S. vessel.[59]


On 13 April 2007, the U.S. Marine Corps announced that it would be sending ten V-22 aircraft to Iraq, the Osprey’s first combat deployment. Marine Corps Commandant, General James Conway, indicated that over 150 Marines would accompany the Osprey set for September deployment to Al-Asad Airfield.[60][61] On 17 September 2007, ten MV-22Bs of VMM-263 left for Iraq aboard the USS Wasp. The decision to use a ship rather than use the Osprey’s self-deployment capability was made because of concerns over icing during the North Atlantic portion of the trip, lack of available KC-130s for mid-air refueling, and the availability of the USS Wasp.[62]


The Osprey has provided support in Iraq, racking up some 2,000 flight hours over three months with a mission capable availability rate of 68.1% as of late-January 2008.[63] They are primarily used in Iraq’s western Anbar province for routine cargo and troop movements, and also for riskier "aero-scout" missions. General David Petraeus, the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, used one to fly around Iraq on Christmas Day 2007 to visit troops.[64] Then-presidential candidate Barack Obama also flew in Ospreys during his high profile 2008 tour of Iraq.[65]


The only major problem has been obtaining the necessary spare parts to maintain the aircraft.[66] The V-22 had flown 3,000 sorties totaling 5,200 hours in Iraq as of July 2008.[67] USMC leadership expect to deploy MV-22s to Afghanistan in 2009.[66][68] General George J. Trautman, III praised the increased range of the V-22 over the legacy helicopters in Iraq and said that "it turned his battle space from the size of Texas into the size of Rhode Island."[69]


Naval Air Systems Command has devised a temporary fix for sailors to place portable heat shields under Osprey engines to prevent damage to the decks of some of the Navy’s smaller amphibious ships, but they determined that a long term solution to the problem would require these decks be redesigned with heat resistant deck coatings, passive thermal barriers and changes in ship structure in order to operate V-22s and F-35Bs.[70]


A Government Accountability Office study reported that by January 2009 the Marines had 12 MV-22s operating in Iraq and they managed to successfully complete all assigned missions. The same report found that the V-22 deployments had mission capable rates averaging 57% to 68% and an overall full mission capable rate of only 6%. It also stated that the aircraft had shown weakness in situational awareness, maintenance, shipboard operations and the ability to transport troops and external cargo.[71] That study also concluded that the "deployments confirmed that the V-22’s enhanced speed and range enable personnel and internal cargo to be transported faster and farther than is possible with the legacy helicopters it is replacing".[71]


The MV-22 saw its first offensive combat mission, Operation Cobra’s Anger on 4 December 2009. Ospreys assisted in inserting 1,000 Marines and 150 Afghan troops into the Now Zad Valley of Helmand Province in southern Afghanistan to disrupt communication and supply lines of the Taliban.[38] In January 2010 the MV-22 Osprey is being sent to Haiti as part of Operation Unified Response relief efforts after the earthquake there. This will be the first use the Marine V-22 in a humanitarian mission.[72]


US Air Force


The Air Force’s first operational CV-22 Osprey was delivered to the 58th Special Operations Wing (58th SOW) at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico on 20 March 2006. This and subsequent aircraft will become part of the 58th SOW’s fleet of aircraft used for training pilots and crew members for special operations use.[73] On 16 November 2006, the Air Force officially accepted the CV-22 in a ceremony conducted at Hurlburt Field, Florida.[74]


The US Air Force’s first operational deployment of the Osprey sent four CV-22s to Mali in November 2008 in support of Exercise Flintlock. The CV-22s flew nonstop from Hurlburt Field, Florida with in-flight refueling.[5] AFSOC declared that the 8th Special Operations Squadron reached Initial Operational Capability on 16 March 2009, with six of its planned nine CV-22s operational.[75]


In June 2009, CV-22s of the 8th Special Operations Squadron delivered 43,000 pounds (20,000 kg) of humanitarian supplies to remote villages in Honduras that were not accessible by conventional vehicles.[76] In November 2009, the 8th SO Squadron and its six CV-22s returned from a three-month deployment in Iraq.[77]


The first possible combat loss of an Osprey occurred on 9 April, 2010, as a CV-22 went down near Qalat, Zabul Province, Afghanistan, killing four.[78][79]


Potential operators


In 1999 the V-22 was studied for use in the United Kingdom’s Royal Navy,[80] it has been raised several times as a candidate for the role of Maritime Airborne Surveillance and Control (MASC).[81]


Israel had shown interest in the purchase of MV-22s, but no order was placed.[82][83] Flightglobal reported in late 2009 that Israel has decided to wait for the CH-53K instead.[84]


The V-22 Osprey is a candidate for the Norwegian All Weather Search and Rescue Helicopter (NAWSARH) that is planned to replace the Westland Sea King Mk.43B of the Royal Norwegian Air Force in 2015.[85] The other candidates for the NAWSARH contract of 10-12 helicopters are AgustaWestland AW101 Merlin, Eurocopter EC225, NHIndustries NH90 and Sikorsky S-92.[86]


Bell Boeing has made an unsolicited offer of the V-22 for US Army medical evacuation needs.[87] However the Joint Personnel Recovery Agency issued a report that said that a common helicopter design would be needed for both combat recovery and medical evacuation and that the V-22 would not be suitable for recovery missions because of the difficulty of hoist operations and lack of self-defense capabilities.[88]


The US Navy remains a potential user of the V-22, but its role and mission with the Navy remains unclear. The latest proposal is to replace the C-2 Greyhound with the V-22 in the fleet logistics role. The V-22 would have the advantage of being able to land on and support non-carriers with rapid delivery of supplies and people between the ships of a taskforce or to ships on patrol beyond helicopter range.[89] Loren B. Thompson of the Lexington Institute has suggested V-22s for use in combat search and rescue and Marine One VIP transport, which also need replacement aircraft.[90]


Variants


V-22A 

•• Pre-production full-scale development aircraft used for flight testing. These are unofficially considered A-variants after 1993 redesign.[91]


HV-22 

•• The U.S. Navy considered an HV-22 to provide combat search and rescue, delivery and retrieval of special warfare teams along with fleet logistic support transport. However, it chose the MH-60S for this role in 1992.[92]


SV-22 

•• The proposed anti-submarine warfare Navy variant. The Navy studied the SV-22 in the 1980s to replace S-3 and SH-2 aircraft.[93]


MV-22B 

•• Basic U.S. Marine Corps transport; original requirement for 552 (now 360). The Marine Corps is the lead service in the development of the V-22 Osprey. The Marine Corps variant, the MV-22B, is an assault transport for troops, equipment and supplies, capable of operating from ships or from expeditionary airfields ashore. It is replacing the Marine Corps’ CH-46E[57] and CH-53D.[94]


CV-22B 

•• Air Force variant for the U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM). It will conduct long-range, special operations missions, and is equipped with extra fuel tanks and terrain-following radar.[95][96]


Operators


 United States


United States Air Force


•• 8th Special Operations Squadron (8 SOS) at Hurlburt Field, Florida

•• 71st Special Operations Squadron (71 SOS) at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico

•• 20th Special Operations Squadron (20 SOS) at Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico


United States Marine Corps


•• VMM-161

•• VMM-162

•• VMM-261

•• VMM-263

•• VMM-264

•• VMM-266

•• VMM-365

•• VMMT-204 – Training squadron

•• VMX-22 – Marine Tiltrotor Operational Test and Evaluation Squadron


Notable accidents


Main article: Accidents and incidents involving the V-22 Osprey


From 1991 to 2000 there were four significant crashes, and a total of 30 fatalities, during testing.[32] Since becoming operational in 2007, the V-22 has had one possible combat loss due to an unknown cause, no losses due to accidents, and seven other notable, but minor, incidents.


• On 11 June 1991, a mis-wired flight control system led to two minor injuries when the left nacelle struck the ground while the aircraft was hovering 15 feet (4.6 m) in the air, causing it to bounce and catch fire.[97]


• On 20 July 1992, a leaking gearbox led to a fire in the right nacelle, causing the aircraft to drop into the Potomac River in front of an audience of Congressmen and other government officials at Quantico, killing all seven on board and grounding the aircraft for 11 months.[98]


• On 8 April 2000, a V-22 loaded with Marines to simulate a rescue, attempted to land at Marana Northwest Regional Airport in Arizona, stalled when its right rotor entered vortex ring state, rolled over, crashed, and exploded, killing all 19 on board.[37]


• On 11 December 2000, after a catastrophic hydraulic leak and subsequent software instrument failure, a V-22 fell 1,600 feet (490 m) into a forest in Jacksonville, North Carolina, killing all four aboard. This caused the Marine Corps to ground their fleet of eight V-22s, the second grounding that year.[99][100]


Specifications (MV-22B)


Data from Boeing Integrated Defense Systems,[101] Naval Air Systems Command,[102] US Air Force CV-22 fact sheet,[95] Norton,[103] and Bell[104]


General characteristics


Crew: Four (pilot, copilot and two flight engineers)

Capacity: 24 troops (seated), 32 troops (floor loaded) or up to 15,000 lb (6,800 kg) of cargo (dual hook)

Length: 57 ft 4 in (17.5 m)

Rotor diameter: 38 ft 0 in (11.6 m)

Wingspan: 45 ft 10 in (14 m)

Width with rotors: 84 ft 7 in (25.8 m)

Height: 22 ft 1 in/6.73 m; overall with nacelles vertical (17 ft 11 in/5.5 m; at top of tailfins)

Disc area: 2,268 ft² (212 m²)

Wing area: 301.4 ft² (28 m²)

Empty weight: 33,140 lb (15,032 kg)

Loaded weight: 47,500 lb (21,500 kg)

Max takeoff weight: 60,500 lb (27,400 kg)

Powerplant:Rolls-Royce Allison T406/AE 1107C-Liberty turboshafts, 6,150 hp (4,590 kW) each


Performance


Maximum speed: 250 knots (460 km/h, 290 mph) at sea level / 305 kn (565 km/h; 351 mph) at 15,000 ft (4,600 m)[105]

Cruise speed: 241 knots (277 mph, 446 km/h) at sea level

Range: 879 nmi (1,011 mi, 1,627 km)

Combat radius: 370 nmi (426 mi, 685 km)

Ferry range: 1,940 nmi (with auxiliary internal fuel tanks)

Service ceiling: 26,000 ft (7,925 m)

Rate of climb: 2,320 ft/min (11.8 m/s)

Disc loading: 20.9 lb/ft² at 47,500 lb GW (102.23 kg/m²)

Power/mass: 0.259 hp/lb (427 W/kg)


Armament


• 1× M240 machine gun on ramp, optional


Notable appearances in media


Main article: Aircraft in fiction#V-22 Osprey


See also


Elizabeth A. Okoreeh-Baah, USMC – first female to pilot a V-22 Osprey


Related development


Bell XV-15[106]

Bell/Agusta BA609

Bell Boeing Quad TiltRotor


Comparable aircraft


Canadair CL-84

LTV XC-142


Related lists


List of military aircraft of the United States

List of VTOL aircraft


References


Bibliography


• Markman, Steve and Bill Holder. "Bell/Boeing V-22 Osprey Tilt-Engine VTOL Transport (U.S.A.)". Straight Up: A History of Vertical Flight. Schiffer Publishing, 2000. ISBN 0-7643-1204-9.

• Norton, Bill. Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey, Tiltrotor Tactical Transport. Midland Publishing, 2004. ISBN 1-85780-165-2.


External links


Wikimedia Commons has media related to: V-22 Osprey


Official Boeing V-22 site

Official Bell V-22 site

V-22 Osprey web, and www.history.navy.mil/planes/v-22.html

CV-22 fact sheet on USAF site

www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/v-22.htm

www.airforce-technology.com/projects/osprey/

Onward and Upward

"Flight of the Osprey", US Navy video of V-22 operations



(Source from China rapid prototype company blog)